II PZ 36/08
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; filing for court-appointed counsel does not imply request for fee waiver.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's appeal against a lower court's rejection of the appeal due to unpaid fees. The plaintiff argued that a request for a court-appointed lawyer implicitly included a request for fee exemption, citing a Constitutional Court ruling that had not yet taken effect. The court ruled that the statutory right to appointed counsel exists independently of fee waivers, meaning the appeal was properly rejected for non-payment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych art. 96 ust. 1 pkt 4; Kodeks postępowania cywilnego art. 117 § 6: Filing a request for a court-appointed lawyer does not constitute an implicit request for exemption from court costs.
Keywords
AI generated
court-appointed counsel
fee exemption waiver
civil procedure appeal
legal representation
court costs statute
implied request
professional representative
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 35 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 117 § 6 k.p.c.
art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 96 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 117 § 1 k.p.c
art. 32 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c
art. 117 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienia Sądu Najwyższego: z dnia 28 sierpnia 2007 r., II UZ 27/07
postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego: z dnia 14 stycznia 2008 r., II UZ 39/07
postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego: z dnia 5 lipca 2008 r., III UZP 6/07
postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego: z dnia 3 września 2008 r., I UZ 13/08