II PK 56/08
AI generated
Employee dismissed for missing deadline to challenge employer's termination of fixed-term employment contract.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding the employer's termination of a fixed-term employment contract. The court found that the employee failed to file a timely objection to the employer's unilateral declaration that the contract had expired, as required by labor law. Consequently, the court ruled that the employee must challenge such actions through the specific procedure for invalidating employer acts rather than general contract invalidity claims.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 58 k.p. w związku z art. 264 § 2 k.p.; Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.: An employee must challenge an employer's unilateral act terminating a fixed-term contract within the statutory deadline; failure to do so precludes a separate claim for contract invalidity.
Keywords
AI generated
fixed-term employment contract
termination by employer
statutory deadline
cassation appeal
labor law procedure
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 58 k.p.
Art. 264 § 2 k.p.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 265 k.p.
Art. 370 § 1 zdanie drugie k.s.h.
art. 58 k.p
art. 264 § 2 k.p
art. 18 k.p
art. 8 k.p
art. 30 § 1 pkt 4 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedI PKN 117/99, OSNAPiUS 2000 nr 17, poz. 646
II PK 113/04
Third fixed-term contract before EU accession automatically converts to indefinite term regardless of subsequent law suspension.