Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 53/08 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal; union officer protection requires no separate representation authorization.

Case Number II PK 53/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a school regarding the termination of a teacher's employment. The teacher argued she was protected as a union official but lacked specific authorization to represent the union, while the school cited organizational changes as the sole reason for dismissal. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for union officer protection is satisfied solely by their position in the union's management board, rendering separate authorization unnecessary.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy o związkach zawodowych; Art. 52 ust. 1 pkt 1 statutu ZNP; The protection of a union official under Article 32 of the Trade Unions Act does not require separate authorization to represent the organization, as the statutory position in the union's management board suffices.

Keywords

AI generated
union officer protection trade unions act employment termination representation authorization cassation appeal management board labor dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 32 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
Art. 52 ust. 1 pkt 1 statutu ZNP
§ 32 rozporządzenia z dnia 16 czerwca 2003 r.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 45 k.p
art. 8 k.p
art. 32 k.p
art. 52 k.p
art. 53 k.p
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text