Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 16/08 AI generated

Polish Supreme Court allows appeal against employer when worker mistakenly names board chair as defendant.

Case Number II PK 16/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland set aside a labor court judgment dismissing the plaintiff's claim for wrongful dismissal. The plaintiff had incorrectly named the employer's board chair as the defendant instead of the company itself, but confirmed this error during the proceedings. The court ruled that such a clerical mistake in identifying the defendant can be corrected under specific procedural articles without invalidating the appeal.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 130 § 1 zdanie drugie k.p.c. w związku z art. 467 k.p.c.; Art. 203 k.p.c.; Art. 477 k.p.c. w związku z art. 194 § 1 i 3 k.p.c.; If a worker mistakenly names the board chair of the employer as the defendant instead of the employer, this error may be corrected by the labor court as an obvious inaccuracy in the defendant's designation if the worker verifies the correct designation.

Keywords

AI generated
wrongful dismissal appeal incorrect defendant designation labor court procedure clerical error correction employer liability procedural remedy supreme court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 130 § 1 zdanie drugie k.p.c.
Art. 467 k.p.c.
Art. 203 k.p.c.
Art. 477 k.p.c. w związku z art. 194 § 1 i 3 k.p.c.
Art. 264 § 1 k.p.
art. 130 § 1 k.p.c
art. 467 k.p.c
art. 264 § 1 k.p
art. 3 k.p
art. 477 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I CKN 749/00

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text