Appeal delay dismissed because disclosing social security records to the insurance fund justified the postponement.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's complaint regarding the excessive length of the appeal proceedings. The appellant argued that the court's failure to schedule a hearing deprived him of livelihood, while the court president noted that social security records were repeatedly disclosed to the insurance fund to handle a separate claim. The court ruled that this administrative necessity, combined with the appointment of a court-appointed lawyer, justified the delay and prevented the finding of procedural delay.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedUstawa o skardze na naruszenie prawa strony do rozpoznania sprawy w postępowaniu sądowym bez nieuzasadnionej zwłoki; Art. 4 ust. 1; Art. 5 ust. 1; Art. 12 ust. 1: The disclosure of social security records to the insurance fund for a separate administrative matter constitutes a valid reason for delaying the appeal hearing, thereby precluding a finding of procedural delay.