Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 25/08 AI generated

Employee dismissed for failure to notify employer of new address during notice period, allowing non-compete termination.

Case Number I PK 25/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding a non-compete agreement termination. The court found that the employer validly exercised its right to terminate the agreement because the employee failed to notify the employer of a new address during the statutory notice period. Consequently, the employee was held liable for the consequences of this failure to inform, which allowed the employer to terminate the agreement within the agreed timeframe.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 61 k.c.; Art. 300 k.p.; Art. 395 k.c.; Art. 135 k.p.c.; Art. 136 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 139 k.p.c.: An employee's failure to notify an employer of a new address during the notice period constitutes a breach of duty, allowing the employer to exercise rights under a non-compete agreement against the employee's new location.

Keywords

AI generated
non-compete agreement termination notice period obligations service of declaration employee duty of care substitute service of notice employer rights address notification failure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 61 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 395 k.c.
Art. 135 k.p.c.
Art. 136 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 139 k.p.c.
Art. 398 k.p.c.
art. 61 k.c
art. 139 § 1 k.p.c
art. 61 § 1 k.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II CRN 4/95
III CRN 172/88

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text