Court held that temporary foreign residence does not constitute final cessation of agricultural activity for social insurance purposes.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal against a lower court ruling denying the wife of a farmer voluntary social insurance coverage. The applicant argued that her husband's continued farming and her shared ownership entitled her to coverage after she ceased active participation abroad. The court ruled that 'cessation of agricultural activity' requires a definitive end, not merely temporary absence, as the applicant could theoretically resume work upon return.