Employee dismissed for wrongful termination cannot demand reinstatement based on prior order restoring working conditions.

The Supreme Court partially dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding a claim for reinstatement after a prior judgment restored working conditions. The employee argued that the earlier court order implicitly reinstated him to his previous position, but the court found the order only restored conditions up to the date of the subsequent wrongful termination. Consequently, the court ruled that the employee could only claim compensation for the period he worked under the changed conditions, not a mandate for reinstatement.