III SZ 1/08
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal filed after missed deadline, ruling service of judgment does not reopen time limits.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal because it was filed after the statutory deadline had expired. The lower court determined that the initial service of the judgment with reasoning on July 26, 2007, was effective, and a subsequent request for re-service did not alter this fact. The court held that while parties may request copies of judgments at any time, such service cannot restart the appeal period if the original service was valid.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 9 k.p.c.; Art. 369 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 373 k.p.c. Service of a judgment with reasoning does not reopen the appeal period if the initial service was effective, and a subsequent request for re-service has no procedural significance.
Keywords
AI generated
service of judgment
appeal deadline
effective service
re-service
civil procedure code
missed deadline
procedural time limits
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 9 k.p.c.
Art. 328 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 369 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 373 k.p.c.
Art. 387 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 139 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 168 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 370 k.p.c
art. 140 k.p.c
art. 233 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedpostanowienie Sądu Najwyższy z 17 sierpnia 2000 r., II CKN 871/00
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższy z 27 września 2000 r., V CKN 1431/00
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższy z 10 marca 2000 r., IV CZ 18/00
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższy z 12 września 2001 r., I PZ 59/01
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższy z 20 października 1987 r., IV CZ 147/87