Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PZ 15/08 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal dismissed for improper fee payment due to unconstitutional regulation interpretation.

Case Number II PZ 15/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court overturned the Regional Court's dismissal of an appeal because the defendant paid the fee to the wrong court account. Although the lower court rejected the appeal under a regulation requiring payment to the first-instance court, the Supreme Court found this regulation unconstitutional. Consequently, the court held that paying the fee to either the first or second instance satisfies the legal requirement.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

§ 2 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z 31 stycznia 2006 r. w sprawie sposobu uiszczania opłat sądowych w sprawach cywilnych; The Supreme Court ruled that the Constitutional Court's finding of unconstitutionality regarding the definition of the 'proper court' for appeal fees means payment to either the first or second instance court satisfies the statutory requirement.

Keywords

AI generated
unconstitutional regulation court fee payment appeal dismissal proper court definition Constitutional Court ruling civil procedure law budgetary revenue

Cited Legislation

AI generated
§ 2 ust. 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z 31 stycznia 2006 r. w sprawie sposobu uiszczania opłat sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 369 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 370 k.p.c.
art. 1302 § 1 i 3 k.p.c.
art. 373 k.p.c.
art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 2 Konstytucji
art. 78 Konstytucji
art. 190 ust. 4 Konstytucji
art. 3941 § 2 i 3 k.p.c.
art. 39821 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text