I PO 1/08
AI generated
Supreme Court held that declaring admissibility of retrial does not require vacating the final judgment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Poland declared the retrial proceedings admissible and ordered the resumption of the case in part. The plaintiff sought to overturn a final judgment regarding unpaid vacation compensation and other damages after an employer terminated her employment without notice. The court ruled that the statutory basis for retrial did not mandate vacating the prior judgment, only establishing its admissibility for the second instance court to review.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 4011 k.p.c.; Art. 412 § 4 k.p.c.: Declaring the admissibility of a retrial proceeding does not require the Supreme Court to vacate the final judgment, but merely suspends its binding force in the contested portion.
Keywords
AI generated
retrial admissibility
Supreme Court procedure
vacating judgment
binding force suspension
second instance review
employment termination
vacation compensation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 4011 k.p.c.
Art. 412 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 412 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 412 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 190 ust. 4 Konstytucji RP
art. 4011 k.p.c
art. 412 § 4 k.p.c
art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 k.p
art. 445 k.c
art. 58 k.p