Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PO 1/08 AI generated

Supreme Court held that declaring admissibility of retrial does not require vacating the final judgment.

Case Number I PO 1/08
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland declared the retrial proceedings admissible and ordered the resumption of the case in part. The plaintiff sought to overturn a final judgment regarding unpaid vacation compensation and other damages after an employer terminated her employment without notice. The court ruled that the statutory basis for retrial did not mandate vacating the prior judgment, only establishing its admissibility for the second instance court to review.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 4011 k.p.c.; Art. 412 § 4 k.p.c.: Declaring the admissibility of a retrial proceeding does not require the Supreme Court to vacate the final judgment, but merely suspends its binding force in the contested portion.

Keywords

AI generated
retrial admissibility Supreme Court procedure vacating judgment binding force suspension second instance review employment termination vacation compensation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 4011 k.p.c.
Art. 412 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 412 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 412 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 190 ust. 4 Konstytucji RP
art. 4011 k.p.c
art. 412 § 4 k.p.c
art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 k.p
art. 445 k.c
art. 58 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text