I PK 315/07
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses overtime bonus claim for part-time workers due to lack of contractual agreement on extra hours.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding an unpaid overtime bonus for a part-time employee. The court held that such a bonus is conditional upon a mutual agreement between employer and employee regarding the permissible number of overtime hours. Consequently, without a specific contractual clause establishing this limit, the statutory provision allowing the bonus does not apply.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 1511 § 1 k.p.; Art. 151 § 5 k.p.: The statutory right to an overtime bonus for part-time employees is contingent upon a prior mutual agreement between the parties defining the permissible number of hours exceeding the contractual work schedule.
Keywords
AI generated
part-time employment
overtime bonus entitlement
contractual agreement requirement
labor law interpretation
Supreme Court cassation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 1511 § 1 k.p.
Art. 151 § 5 k.p.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
art. 1511 § 1 k.p
art. 151 § 5 k.p
art. 78 k.p
art. 171 § 1 k.p
art. 45 § 1 k.p
Cited Case Law
AI generatedHelmig and Others, C-399/92, C-409/92, C-425/92, C-34/93, C-50/93, C-78/93
Elsner-Lakeberg, C-285/02
Ursula Voß, C-300/06