II UK 306/07
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed pension claim, ruling concurrent non-harmful work cannot count as special conditions employment.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Roman N. against a social insurance office decision denying early retirement rights. The applicant argued that his concurrent work in a battery charging station should be considered as special conditions employment alongside his main job. The court rejected this, stating that work not harmful to the employee's organism cannot be included in the required special conditions period.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.: Work performed concurrently within the daily working hours that does not adversely affect the employee's organism cannot be considered as work performed under special conditions for the purpose of acquiring early retirement rights.
Keywords
AI generated
early retirement rights
special conditions employment
harmful working conditions
concurrent work
social insurance benefits
cassation appeal
working hours
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 17 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 18 ust. 1 k.r.s.
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c
art. 381 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c