II UK 303/07
AI generated
Supreme Court allows social security claim for farmer holding land without legal title as possessor.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court set aside the appellate court's dismissal of the applicant's social security claim regarding his status as a farmer. The applicant argued he remained a farmer because he factually possessed the farm despite lacking legal title after the lease expired. The court ruled that possession under civil law does not require a legal title, thereby allowing the applicant to be classified as a farmer for social insurance purposes.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 336 k.c.; Art. 6 pkt 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników: Possession for social insurance purposes includes factual control without legal title, as possession is defined by physical control and intent to possess, not by the existence of a legal right.
Keywords
AI generated
possession without title
social security insurance
agricultural activity
dependent possession
civil law definition
social insurance obligation
factual control
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 336 k.c.
Art. 6 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 7 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 16 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 38 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 336 k.c
art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c