Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PZ 65/07 AI generated

Appeal dismissed; facts known in prior trial do not constitute new discovery under Polish Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number II PZ 65/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellants' request for a retrial, upholding the lower court's rejection of their claims. The appellants argued that new witness testimonies from a criminal proceeding proved their statements in the labor dispute were false. The court ruled that because these witnesses had already testified in the original labor case, the facts were not 'newly discovered' but merely overlooked by the parties. Consequently, the statutory grounds for reopening the case under Article 403 § 2 of the Civil Procedure Code were not met.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.; The concept of 'newly discovered' circumstances or evidence refers strictly to facts or proofs that were completely unknown and unaccessible to the parties in the prior proceedings, excluding facts that were merely overlooked or could have been proven through active participation in the original trial.

Keywords

AI generated
newly discovered evidence retrial grounds Civil Procedure Code overlooked facts witness testimony labor dispute procedural remedy

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 403 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
§ 20 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 28 września 2002 r.
art. 410 § 1 k.p.c
art. 403 § 2 k.p.c
art. 411 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text