Supreme Court dismisses appeal as cassation court lacks jurisdiction over substantive law application issues.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a social security beneficiary against a decision denying him early retirement based on teaching work. The applicant argued that his leadership roles in the Volunteer Fire Brigades should count as teaching work, but the Social Security Office rejected this due to a lack of higher education with pedagogical preparation. The court ruled that the cassation procedure cannot address the substantive legal question of whether new provisions apply retroactively to facts preceding the 2000 amendment, as no specific material law provision governs this issue.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 1 ust. 1 pkt 5 w związku z art. 9 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. - Karta Nauczyciela; The cassation court lacks jurisdiction to decide on the substantive legal issue of applying amended provisions to facts preceding the amendment's entry into force.