Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 252/07 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed appeal, ruling inventor's compensation must align with statutory patent protection limits.

Case Number II PK 252/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Andrzej S. against the Second Instance Court's judgment. The court held that Article 98a(1) of the Patent Act requires inventor compensation to be tied to the statutory duration of patent protection, preventing contractual agreements from extending this period indefinitely. Consequently, the court affirmed that the lower court correctly awarded compensation based on the original protection term rather than an unlimited contractual scope.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 98a ust. 1 ustawy o wynalazczości; Art. 8 ust. 1 i Art. 80 ust. 2 ustawy o wynalazczości: The right to compensation for a utility model creator is a consequence of the enterprise's use of the invention during the statutory protection period and cannot be contractually extended beyond the maximum duration set by the legislator.

Keywords

AI generated
utility model compensation patent protection term contractual limitation inventor remuneration statutory duration cassation appeal Article 98a Patent Act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 98a ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 19 października 1972 r. o wynalazczości
Art. 8 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 19 października 1972 r. o wynalazczości
Art. 80 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 19 października 1972 r. o wynalazczości
Art. 353 § 1 k.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 353 § 1 k.c
art. 3531 k.c
art. 56 k.c
art. 65 § 2 k.c
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text