Cassation appeal dismissed because Art. 386 § 4 CPC regulates first-instance failure, not second-instance failure to address all appeal grounds.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Adam P. against the Regional Court's final judgment in an employment compensation dispute. The appellant argued that the second-instance court violated procedural law by failing to address all of his appeal grounds, specifically regarding alleged employer misconduct. The court ruled that Article 386 § 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure only governs the first instance's duty to examine the case, not the second instance's obligation to address every appeal claim, rendering the appellant's legal argument inapplicable.