Court held procedural flaws in appointing a telecom regulator do not invalidate their appointment or process powers.

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether procedural errors in appointing the President of the Electronic Communications Authority (UKE) invalidated their appointment. The plaintiff argued that omitting specific consultation steps under the Transformation Act rendered the appointment void, thereby invalidating the authority's process powers. The court ruled that such procedural defects do not affect the validity of the appointment act or the President's capacity to act as a party in court. Consequently, the court confirmed that the President can validly grant process powers based solely on the appointment act, and ordinary courts lack jurisdiction to review the legality of that appointment.