Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 163/07 AI generated

Cassation appeal dismissed; procedural expansion of claim in appeal does not alter case scope after remand.

Case Number II PK 163/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a labor court judgment awarding damages for wrongful dismissal. The appellant argued that the appeal process should have allowed for a broader claim regarding reinstatement, but the court found the procedural history limited the scope to the original request. The court ruled that expanding the claim during the appeal phase is prohibited by law and cannot retroactively change the subject matter of the case after a remand.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 383 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.: The prohibition against expanding the plaintiff's claim in appellate proceedings does not affect the scope of the case, even after the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded for retrial.

Keywords

AI generated
procedural expansion of claim appellate proceedings limitation scope of case subject matter remand for retrial disposition principle wrongful dismissal damages cassation appeal dismissal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 383 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
Art. 321 k.p.c.
Art. 187 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 45 § 2 k.p.
Art. 477 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 8 k.p.
Art. 56 k.p.
Art. 351 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III ZP 34/98, OSNP 2000 nr 2, poz. 44

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text