Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UZ 45/07 AI generated

Social security case: appointing counsel does not exempt party from basic court fee obligation.

Case Number II UZ 45/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal regarding the non-payment of a basic court fee for a social security matter. The appellant argued that receiving free legal counsel under Article 117 of the Civil Procedure Code implied a waiver of the fee requirement under Article 36 of the Court Costs Act. The court clarified that the appointment of counsel is a separate procedure from fee exemption and must be requested explicitly. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because the appellant failed to file a specific request for fee relief before the appeal was lodged.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 117 § 6 k.p.c.; Art. 36 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych: The appointment of a court-appointed lawyer does not equate to an exemption from the obligation to pay the basic court fee for procedural documents.

Keywords

AI generated
social security litigation court costs exemption court-appointed counsel basic court fee civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 117 § 6 k.p.c.
Art. 36 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 3986 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 96 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 102 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 10 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 117 § 6 k.p.c
art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c
art. 3986 § 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
postanowienie z dnia 14 sierpnia 1997 r., II CZ 88/97, OSNC 1998 nr 3, poz. 40

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text