I UZ 39/07
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; mere mention of social insurance exemption does not constitute a formal request for fee waiver.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's rejection of their appeal due to unpaid filing fees. The appellant argued that a note in their appeal document regarding social insurance exemptions satisfied the legal requirement for a fee waiver request. The court ruled that such a note is merely an annotation and does not constitute a formal, substantiated application for a waiver of the basic fee.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 96 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych; Art. 103 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych: A mere annotation claiming exemption from court costs based on social insurance regulations does not constitute a formal request for a waiver of the basic filing fee.
Keywords
AI generated
court costs
fee waiver
social insurance
legal representation
civil proceedings
formal request
appellant
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 96 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 102 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 103 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 126 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 126 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c