Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 192/07 AI generated

Dismissed: Employee's claim to return to work after fixed-term contract termination is inadmissible, barring damages award.

Case Number I PK 192/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding the award of damages for wrongful termination of a fixed-term employment contract. The lower court had granted damages because the employer failed to obtain necessary medical and scientific council consent for dismissal, violating specific protection statutes. However, the Supreme Court ruled that since the employee's complaint was limited solely to reinstatement, the court could not award damages as an alternative remedy under the relevant labor code provisions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 50 § 5 k.p.; Art. 4771 k.p.c.: Where an employee limits their claim solely to reinstatement after termination of a fixed-term contract outside the circumstances of Art. 50 § 5 k.p., the labor court cannot award damages as an alternative remedy.

Keywords

AI generated
fixed-term contract termination reinstatement claim inadmissibility alternative remedy damages labor code procedural rules cassation appeal dismissal employment protection statutes two-instance procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 50 § 5 k.p.
Art. 4771 k.p.c.
Art. 50 § 3 k.p.
Art. 383 k.p.c.
Art. 367 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c.
Art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39815 k.p.c.
Art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 39814 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text