III BOZ 1/07
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal against rejection of non-compliance claim due to lack of legal standing.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's rejection of a non-compliance claim. The appellant argued that the fee for the rejected claim was paid correctly, but the court found the appeal procedurally inadmissible. The court ruled that since a final judgment had already been rejected, the appellant had the right to appeal that specific decision, making a new non-compliance claim against the rejection order legally impossible.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 3941 § 1 k.p.c.: A non-compliance claim against a final judgment rejecting a non-compliance claim is inadmissible because the party already possesses the right to appeal the rejection order.
Keywords
AI generated
non-compliance claim
procedural inadmissibility
legal standing
appeal rights
final judgment
civil procedure code
rejection order
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 4248 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 10 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 18 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 18 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 28 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 3941 § 1 k.p.c
art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c
art. 4248 § 1 k.p.c