Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZ 20/07 AI generated

Supreme Court allows improperly paid appeal by lawyer when fee waiver request was previously rejected.

Case Number I PZ 20/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court overturned the District Court's dismissal of an appeal filed by a lawyer who had previously submitted a fee waiver request that was rejected. The lower court rejected the appeal because the fee waiver request was returned due to a missing declaration, creating a new obligation to pay court fees. The Supreme Court ruled that the rejection of the fee waiver request did not retroactively create a fee obligation at the time of filing, making the dismissal premature without a prior summons to pay.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 102 ust. 4 ustawy o kosztach sądowych; The rejection of a fee waiver request does not retroactively create a court fee obligation for a subsequently filed appeal, and the appeal cannot be dismissed under Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c. without a prior summons to pay.

Keywords

AI generated
court fees fee waiver request improperly paid appeal professional lawyer premature dismissal summons to pay civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 102 ust. 4 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 130 § 2 zdanie drugie k.p.c.
Art. 3941 k.p.c.
Art. 3981 k.p.c.
art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c
art. 1302 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c
art. 380 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text