III UO 14/07
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for retrial as inadmissible due to lack of legal counsel representation.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court rejected the appellant's request for a retrial, ruling it inadmissible because it was filed personally without legal representation. The appellant, a construction company, sought to overturn a previous dismissal of their cassation appeal, arguing that the lack of written reasoning violated constitutional rights. The court held that under Polish law, parties before the Supreme Court must be represented by lawyers unless specific statutory exceptions apply, which did not cover this entity.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 871 § 1, 2 k.p.c.; Art. 410 § 1 k.p.c.: A party before the Supreme Court must be represented by a lawyer or legal advisor; a personal filing by a party lacking statutory exceptions renders the appeal inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generated
representation requirement
Supreme Court procedure
inadmissible appeal
legal counsel mandate
retrial request rejection
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 871 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 871 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 410 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 3989 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 45 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
Art. 31 ust. 3 Konstytucji RP
Art. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 871 § 2 k.p.c
art. 410 § 1 k.p.c
art. 2 Konstytucji RP