Non-compete compensation after employment ends is not covered by Banking Law Art. 169; interim management does not automatically end non-compete obligations.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal, remanding the case for a new trial on the compensation claim. The lower court had rejected the plaintiff's claim for damages under a non-compete agreement following his forced removal from a bank's management role. The Supreme Court ruled that the appointment of interim management does not automatically terminate the non-compete obligations established under the Civil Code, as the bank's legal entity and the risk of information leakage remained intact.