I BP 21/07
AI generated
SCA dismissed because proving damage is required for a legality challenge to a final ruling.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's complaint for declaring a final court order inconsistent with the law. The lower court rejected the appeal due to an incorrect calculation of court fees, and the plaintiff argued this violated constitutional rights. The court held that such a complaint is only admissible if the plaintiff can prove actual damage caused by the ruling, which they failed to do.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 4241 § 2 k.p.c.; art. 4171 § 2 k.c.: A complaint for declaring a final ruling inconsistent with the law does not lead to its annulment but enables a claim for damages against the State Treasury, requiring the plaintiff to prove actual damage caused by the ruling.
Keywords
AI generated
complaint for legality
final court ruling
proof of damage
State Treasury claim
civil procedure law
court fees appeal
constitutional rights
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 4241 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 4171 § 2 k.c.
art. 4248 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.
art. 35 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 96 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 42411 § 2 k.p.c
art. 4171 § 2 k.c
art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c
art. 78 Konstytucji RP