II PZ 17/07
AI generated
Supreme Court allows appeal by attorney for missing scope when full case is challenged under Civil Procedure Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court of Poland allowed the appellant's appeal, overturning the lower court's dismissal based on a missing scope of challenge. The lower court rejected the appeal because the lawyer failed to specify the disputed amount, citing procedural defects under the Civil Procedure Code. The Supreme Court ruled that challenging a judgment in its entirety implicitly defines the scope, rendering the specific amount requirement unnecessary when the full case is contested.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 368 § 1 pkt 1, 5 k.p.c.; Art. 3701 § 1 k.p.c.: When a party challenges a judgment in its entirety, the scope of the challenge is deemed to cover the entire judgment, and the specific designation of the scope in the appeal petition is not required.
Keywords
AI generated
scope of challenge
appeal petition requirements
attorney procedural defect
full case challenge
Civil Procedure Code
dismissal of appeal
implicit scope definition
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 368 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
art. 368 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.c.
art. 3701 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 378 k.p.c.
art. 25 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 398 § 16 k.p.c.
art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 368 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 368 § 1 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 3701 k.p.c