Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UK 164/06 AI generated

Polish Supreme Court dismissed cassation; choosing one pension system excludes later claims in another.

Case Number II UK 164/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Bolesław H. against a decision denying him a rural pension. The applicant had previously elected to count his service years toward an employee pension, which the court ruled legally precluded counting the same period for a rural pension. The court held that the statutory choice of one pension system excludes the possibility of later claiming rights in another system for the identical period.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 20 ust. 2 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników; art. 10 ust. 3 ustawy o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych: The insured's choice to allocate a specific period toward a pension in one system legally precludes the subsequent allocation of that same period toward a pension in another system.

Keywords

AI generated
rural pension employee pension insurance period choice of system exclusion clause cassation appeal pension rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 20 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
art. 10 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 17 grudnia 1998 r. o emeryturach i rentach z Funduszu Ubezpieczeń Społecznych
art. 2 Konstytucji RP
art. 5 k.c
art. 2 Konstytucji
art. 67 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 156 § 1 pkt 2 k.p
art. 39813 § 2 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
art. 97 § 4 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text