Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 293/06 AI generated

Supreme Court voids appeal proceedings when a co-defendant formally appeals against a judgment not addressed to them.

Case Number II PK 293/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court declared the appeal proceedings void because the Court of Appeal ruled against a defendant based solely on an appeal filed by a co-defendant. The lower court had issued a final judgment against one entity while ignoring the appeal lodged by another formal co-defendant regarding a different party. The court held that a co-defendant can only appeal their own judgment, making the appeal procedurally inadmissible and the subsequent ruling void.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 370 k.p.c.; Art. 373 k.p.c.; Art. 379 k.p.c.; Art. 398 k.p.c.; Art. 3982 k.p.c.; Art. 386 k.p.c. - An appeal filed by a formal co-defendant against a judgment not addressed to them is inadmissible, rendering the second-instance proceedings void and the resulting judgment ineffective.

Keywords

AI generated
inadmissible appeal formal co-defendant void proceedings final judgment procedural defect

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 370 k.p.c.
Art. 373 k.p.c.
Art. 379 k.p.c.
Art. 398 k.p.c.
Art. 3982 k.p.c.
Art. 386 k.p.c.
art. 231 § 1 k.p
art. 386 §1 k.p.c
art. 363 § 1 k.p
art. 3982 § 2 pkt 2 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZP 34/91 OSNCP 1992 nr 2, poz. 24
III PK 7/04 OSNP 2005 nr 2, poz. 21
III CZP 25/67
III CZP 34/91
III PK 7/04
Supreme Court dissent argues for remand due to lack of specific party claims and unnamed joint participation.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text