Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I UZ 9/07 AI generated

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal dismissal due to lawyer's declaration omission as non-essential after law change.

Case Number I UZ 9/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court overturned the appellate court's dismissal of a cassation appeal regarding early retirement benefits. The lower court rejected the appeal because the lawyer's power of attorney lacked a specific declaration that the lawyer was not employed, a requirement previously mandated by statute. The Supreme Court ruled that following a 2005 amendment, this declaration is merely informational and does not prevent the appeal from proceeding, thus the dismissal was unlawful.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 8 ust. 2 ustawy o radcach prawnych; Art. 89 § 3 k.p.c.: The omission of a lawyer's employment declaration in a power of attorney is informational only and cannot serve as grounds for dismissing a cassation appeal.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal dismissal lawyer power of attorney employment declaration requirement statutory amendment effect procedural formalities social insurance benefits Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 8 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Art. 89 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 3984 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 3986 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 39816 w związku z art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 84 § 3 k.p.c
art. 89 § 3 k.p.c
art. 3986 k.p.c
art. 65 ust. 1 Konstytucji
art. 96 § 1 k.p.c

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text