Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I BP 16/07 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses cassation appeal as inadmissible due to lack of proven damage and procedural standing.

Case Number I BP 16/07
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a second-instance court order rejecting an appeal. The plaintiff argued that the first-instance decision was delivered late, causing him to miss a deadline and lose the right to early retirement. The court rejected this claim because the contested order was merely procedural and did not directly cause the alleged loss of retirement rights, which remained hypothetical. Furthermore, the plaintiff failed to prove that the specific second-instance order caused the damage, as the injury stemmed from a different earlier ruling.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.; A cassation appeal against a second-instance order dismissing an appeal is inadmissible if the plaintiff cannot prove direct damage caused by that specific order, as the order is procedural and the alleged loss is hypothetical.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal inadmissibility procedural order dismissal proof of damage requirement causal link failure hypothetical loss rejection second instance appeal early retirement rights

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 4245 § 1 pkt 4 k.p.c.
art. 4248 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 4248 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 3941 § 2 k.p.c
art. 4241 § 1 k.p.c
art. 397 § 2 k.p.c
art. 3941 k.p.c
art. 4245 § 1 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 31 stycznia 2006 r., IV CNP 38/05, OSNC 2006 nr 7-8, poz. 141
wyroki Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 8 kwietnia 1999 r., II UKN 619/98, OSNAPiUS 2000 nr 11, 5 poz. 439
wyroki Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 8 grudnia 1998 r., II UKN 357/98, OSNAPiUS 2000 nr 3, poz. 112
postanowienie Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 27 stycznia 2006 r., II CNP 18/05, OSNC 2006 nr 7-8, poz. 139
IV CNP 38/05
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for non-confirmation of loss under Art. 4245 § 1(4) CPC due to lack of proven causation.
II CNP 18/05

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text