I PZ 1/07
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal; filing deadline not extended by request for court-appointed counsel.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's rejection of a request for a court-appointed lawyer. The appellant argued that the filing deadline should start from the date of the lawyer's appointment rather than the original notice. The court held that the statutory deadline runs from the date of service and is not interrupted or extended by a subsequent request for counsel, though such a request may justify restoring the deadline.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 394 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.: The time limit for filing an appeal runs from the date of service and is not interrupted or extended by a party's request for a court-appointed lawyer, although such a request may serve as grounds for restoring the deadline.
Keywords
AI generated
court-appointed lawyer
filing deadline
appeal procedure
time limit interruption
restoration of deadline
court-appointed counsel
service of notice
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 394 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
art. 871 § 1 k.p.c
art. 130 § 5 k.p.c
art. 5 k.p.c
art. 394 § 2 k.p.c
art. 370 k.p.c
art. 39814 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII CZ 35/97
II CZ 106/98
I CZ 76/00
II CZ 81/02
V CZ 42/03
I CZ 4/04