I PZ 22/06
AI generated
Criminal appeal dismissed for non-payment of separate court fees for each formal co-plaintiff.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a labor court judgment restoring two formal co-plaintiffs to employment. Although the appellant paid only one court fee, the court held that each formal co-plaintiff requires a separate fee because they represent distinct legal interests. The appeal was rejected because the single fee paid did not cover the mandatory dual fees required by law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 35 ust. 1 zd. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych; Art. 72 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: Separate court fees are mandatory for cassation appeals filed against multiple formal co-plaintiffs, as each constitutes a distinct procedural act requiring independent payment.
Keywords
AI generated
formal co-plaintiff
cassation appeal
court fees
labor law
procedural act
separate payment
dismissed appeal
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 35 ust. 1 zd. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 72 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 18 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 18 ust. 2 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c
art. 72 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 72 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c
art. 219 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c