III UK 120/06
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; death not in war due to lack of partisan combat participation.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a claim for a family pension based on a father's death. The applicant argued that his father's death during a 1944 armed action constituted war-related death, but the court found no evidence of partisan participation. The court ruled that the statutory requirement for a combat connection was not met by the facts established in the lower courts.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 24 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 29 maja 1974 r. o zaopatrzeniu inwalidów wojennych i wojskowych oraz ich rodzin; Art. 7 tej ustawy; The right to a family pension requires a direct causal link between the soldier's death and participation in military or war-like actions, which cannot be presumed merely from service membership.
Keywords
AI generated
family pension entitlement
war-related death
partisan activity requirement
cassation appeal dismissal
statutory interpretation
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 24 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 29 maja 1974 r. o zaopatrzeniu inwalidów wojennych i wojskowych oraz ich rodzin
Art. 7 ustawy z dnia 29 maja 1974 r. o zaopatrzeniu inwalidów wojennych i wojskowych oraz ich rodzin
Art. 231 k.p.c.
Art. 398 k.p.c.
art. 235 k.p.c
art.13 § 2 k.p.c
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 382 k.p.c
art. 3983 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c
art. 233 § 1 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedIII CKN 811/98
II URN 136/78