Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III PZP 6/06 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled that employer dismissal notices need no reason for termination of appointment contracts.

Case Number III PZP 6/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether employer dismissal notices for appointment contracts must state a reason. The plaintiff, a former director, argued that the lack of a stated cause for his dismissal should entitle him to damages. The court held that such notices do not require a reason because the institution of appointment implies the right to dismiss without cause. Consequently, the plaintiff's claim for damages based on the absence of a stated reason was rejected.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 69 pkt 2 lit. b k.p.; The employer's declaration of dismissal equivalent to termination of an employment contract does not require a stated reason for the resolution of the employment relationship.

Keywords

AI generated
appointment contract dismissal without cause employment termination labor law damages claim

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 69 pkt 2 lit. b k.p.
Ustawa z dnia 20 kwietnia 2004 r. o promocji zatrudnienia i instytucjach rynku pracy
Ustawa z dnia 14 listopada 2003 r. o zmianie ustawy Kodeks pracy oraz o zmianie niektórych innych ustaw
art. 390 § 1 k.p.c
art. 45 § 1 k.p
art. 30 § 4 k.p
art. 69 k.p
art. 70 § 1 k.p
art. 70 k.p
art. 70 § 12 k.p

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text