II PZ 60/06 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal on main claim costs when payment covers both main and reciprocal claims separately.

Case Number II PZ 60/06

Court / Authority Sąd Najwyższy

Jurisdiction

Poland (PL)

Decision Date 2006-12-18

Outcome Allowed / Granted

Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court set aside a lower court order rejecting an appeal due to alleged insufficient court fee payment. The appellant filed a single appeal covering both the main claim and reciprocal claim, paying only the base fee for the main claim. The court ruled that the statutory provision requiring separate fee payment applies only when the payment is ambiguous or unclear, not when the appellant explicitly pays the fee for the main claim portion.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 18 ust. 2 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych; Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.: Separate court fees are required for appeals on main and reciprocal claims only if the payment is ambiguous; otherwise, the appellant must clarify which part the fee covers, but the strict rejection mechanism does not apply to clarify doubts.

Keywords

AI generated

civil procedure law court fees main claim reciprocal claim appeal filing procedural defect fee payment

Cited Legislation

AI generated

Art. 18 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych

Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.

Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.

Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.

art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c

art. 1302 § 1 k.p.c

art. 1302 k.p.c

art. 130 § 1 k.p.c

art. 370 k.p.c

art. 204 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

II UZP 11/06

Supreme Court ruled Art. 1302 § 3 CPC applies to appeals in social insurance cases requiring basic fees.

III CZP 109/06

Basic court fee is a fixed fee under CPC Art. 1302 § 3 for professional counsel.

Supreme Court allows appeal on main claim costs when payment covers both main and reciprocal claims separately.

Legislator summary

Legislator headnote

Keywords

Cited Legislation

Cited Case Law

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Full text