Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 95/06 AI generated

Non-compete clause compensation applies only after employment ends, not during continuous employment changes.

Case Number II PK 95/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's claim for non-compete compensation, ruling that such payments are due only after employment definitively terminates. The court found that since the plaintiff remained continuously employed despite a change in job title, the non-compete obligation had not yet matured. Consequently, the lower court's calculation of damages based on the period before the employment relationship ended was legally incorrect.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1012 k.p.; Non-compete compensation is payable only after the definitive termination of the employment relationship and does not apply if employment continues uninterrupted, even if the job description changes.

Keywords

AI generated
non-compete clause employment termination compensation entitlement continuous employment labor law dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1012 k.p.
Art. 56 k.c.
Art. 300 k.p.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 1012 k.p
art. 1012 § 3 k.p
art. 172 k.p
art. 8 k.p
art. 65 k.c
art. 3 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text