Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PZ 51/06 AI generated

Supreme Court held that limiting a claim in appeal requires redefining the dispute value for court fee calculation under labor law.

Case Number II PZ 51/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland overturned the appellate court's dismissal of a cassation appeal regarding civil court fees in labor disputes. The appellant's lawyer had reduced the claim amount after the first-instance judgment, arguing this set the appeal's value, but the appellate court incorrectly treated it as the dispute value. The Supreme Court ruled that limiting a claim in the appeal procedure necessitates a new determination of the dispute value under the Civil Procedure Code, which in turn dictates whether a basic or proportional fee applies under the Court Fees Act.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 35 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych; Art. 193 k.p.c.: Limiting a claim in appeal proceedings requires redefining the dispute value, thereby determining whether a basic or proportional court fee applies in labor law cases.

Keywords

AI generated
court fees labor law limiting claim appeal dispute value determination proportional fee basis civil procedure code

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 35 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 13 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 18 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 383 k.p.c.
Art. 193 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 391 § 1 k.p.c
art. 3941 § 3 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text