Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II PK 53/06 AI generated

Total employee inactivity in exercising privatization rights due to personal fault bars compensation claims against the state or employer.

Case Number II PK 53/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Waldemar P. against a lower court ruling that rejected his claim for damages. The plaintiff, a former insurance agent, failed to timely purchase privatization shares despite being on the official list and receiving verbal notice, resulting in the expiration of his right. The court held that the total inactivity was solely due to the plaintiff's own negligence, creating no causal link between the defendants' actions and the loss of value.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 38 ust. 2 ustawy o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji; Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.: Total employee inactivity in exercising privatization rights due to personal fault bars compensation claims against the state or employer when no causal link exists between their conduct and the loss.

Keywords

AI generated
privatization rights employee inactivity causal link personal fault damages claim expiration of right state liability

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 38 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 30 sierpnia 1996 r. o komercjalizacji i prywatyzacji
Art. 398 § 14 k.p.c.
Art. 102 k.p.c.
art. 471 k.c
art. 415 k.c
art. 361 k.c
art. 474 k.c
art. 112 k.p
art. 362 k.c
art. 16 k.p

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text