I BP 11/06
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal for non-compliance with law due to failure to cite specific legal provision.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's extraordinary appeal challenging a final labor dispute judgment. The plaintiff argued the lower court misinterpreted statutes regarding appointed public employees and failed to protect acquired rights. The court rejected the appeal because the complaint did not identify the specific legal provision allegedly violated by the contested decision.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 4245 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.; Art. 4248 § 1 k.p.c.: An extraordinary appeal for non-compliance with law must explicitly cite the specific legal provision with which the contested judgment is alleged to be inconsistent; failure to do so renders the appeal inadmissible.
Keywords
AI generated
extraordinary appeal
non-compliance with law
inadmissible complaint
cited legal provision
labor dispute judgment
public employees
acquired rights
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 4245 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c.
Art. 4248 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 4245 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.
Art. 77 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 4171 § 2 k.c.
art. 4245 § 1 pkt 3 k.p.c
art. 231 k.p
art. 77 ust. 1 Konstytucji RP
art. 4171 § 2 k.c
art. 4245 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c