Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 98/06 AI generated

Labor court must decide labor disputes; civil court composition does not invalidate proceedings.

Case Number I PK 98/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the Regional Court's judgment and remanded the case for retrial. The Regional Court had dismissed the plaintiff's claim to establish an employment relationship and related damages, while the Regional Labor Court had previously ruled in favor of the plaintiff. The Supreme Court held that labor courts exclusively handle such disputes and that a jury composition in the first instance did not render the proceedings invalid.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 379 pkt 4 k.p.c.; art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.; art. 391 k.p.c.; Labor courts exclusively adjudicate disputes regarding the existence of an employment relationship and claims derived therefrom; a civil court composition in the first instance does not constitute a procedural defect warranting cassation.

Keywords

AI generated
labor court jurisdiction employment relationship dispute jury composition validity procedural defect cassation remand for retrial

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 379 pkt 4 k.p.c.
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 391 k.p.c.
art. 398 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 108 § 2 k.p.c.
art. 398 § 21 k.p.c.
art. 379 pkt 4 k.p.c
art. 631 k.p.c
art. 22 § 1 k.p
art. 233 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok SN z 21 listopada 1997 r., I CKN 825/97
uchwała składu siedmiu sędziów z dnia 14 marca 1989 r., III PZP 45/88
wyrok SN z 25 listopada 2004 r., I PK 42/04
wyrok SN z 9 marca 2006 r., I CSK 147/05
wyrok SN z 18 listopada 2005 r., IV CK 202/05
I PK 42/04
Supreme Court quashes labor court judgment for civil contract dispute due to improper jury composition.
I CSK 147/05
Supreme Court partially allowed cassation appeal regarding defective soap and dismissed non-monetary claim.
IV CK 202/05
Supreme Court partially allowed divorce appeal, overturning fault finding due to incomplete evidence review.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text