Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SK 15/06 AI generated

Telecom operator's refusal to sign interconnection agreements violates competition law, not just telecom law.

Case Number III SK 15/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that upheld a fine against a telecom operator for refusing interconnection agreements. The operator argued that its conduct should be judged solely under telecom law, but the court found that blocking market entry for independent internet service providers also constitutes a restriction of competition under consumer protection law. Consequently, the court remanded the case to the appellate court to properly assess the fine's justification and the nature of the anti-competitive behavior.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów; ustawa Prawo telekomunikacyjne: A telecommunications operator's refusal to conclude interconnection agreements with independent providers constitutes a restriction of competition under consumer protection law, not merely a matter of telecom regulation.

Keywords

AI generated
telecommunications regulation interconnection agreements restriction of competition consumer protection law anti-monopoly fine market entry barriers cassation appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Ustawa z dnia 15 grudnia 2000 r. o ochronie konkurencji i konsumentów
Ustawa z dnia 21 lipca 2000 r. Prawo telekomunikacyjne
art. 8 ust. 1 uokik
art. 8 ust. 2 pkt 5 uokik
art. 101 uokik
art. 46 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego
art. 83-85 Prawa telekomunikacyjnego
art. 328 § 2 k.p.c
art. 390 § 2 k.p.c
art. 382 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w Warszawie z dnia 16 listopada 2005 r., XVII Ama 97/04
wyrok Sądu Antymonopolowego z dnia 20 września 1995 r., XVII Amr 15/95
wyrok SN z dnia 27 czerwca 2000 r., I CKN 793/98
uchwała Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 7 grudnia 2005 r., III SZP 3/05
I CSK 83/05
Supreme Court allows civil court to declare monopoly abuse contracts void without administrative decision.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text