II UZ 23/06
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal; basic court fee does not violate insured's right to court access.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the insured's appeal against a lower court's rejection of a cassation complaint due to an unpaid basic court fee. The appellant argued that the fee violated Article 98 of the Civil Procedure Costs Act and deprived them of defense rights. The court ruled that the fee obligation is absolute and independent from state expense regulations, finding no violation of the right to court access.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 36 ust. 1; Art. 96; Art. 98 ust. 2 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych: The obligation to pay a basic court fee for appeals and extraordinary remedies is absolute and does not violate the insured's right to court access.
Keywords
AI generated
basic court fee
right to court access
insured party
civil procedure costs
cassation complaint
state expense regulation
procedural fairness
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.
art. 36 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 96 w związku z art. 36 ustawy
art. 100 ust. 2 ustawy
art. 98 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c.
art. 6 ust. 1 Konwencji z dnia 4 listopada 1950 r. o ochronie praw człowieka i podstawowych wolności
art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c
art. 379 pkt 5 k.p.c
art. 385 k.p.c
Cited Case Law
AI generatedorzeczenie z dnia 19 grudnia 1997 r., w sprawie Brualla Gomez de la Torre przeciwko Hiszpanii