Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
I PZ 14/06 AI generated

Supreme Court allows appeal dismissal due to incorrect calculation of dispute value for court fees.

Case Number I PZ 14/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court overturned the District Court's dismissal of the defendant's appeal regarding civil litigation costs. The lower court incorrectly rejected the appeal because it used a disputed value of over 50,000 zł, whereas the Supreme Court found the final specified claim amount was only 45,432.48 zł. Consequently, the appeal was properly paid under the basic fee regime, rendering the lower court's rejection based on the proportional fee rule legally unfounded.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 35 ust. 1 ustawy o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych: The value of the subject matter of the appeal corresponds to the final specified claim amount in the first instance, and if this value falls below the threshold for proportional fees, the appeal must be paid under the basic fee regime.

Keywords

AI generated
court fees proportional fee basic fee value of dispute civil procedure code appeal costs subject matter value

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 35 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 28 lipca 2005 r. o kosztach sądowych w sprawach cywilnych
Art. 19 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 368 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 394 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 398 § 16 k.p.c.
art. 1302 § 3 k.p.c
art. 370 k.p.c
art. 397 § 2 k.p.c
art. 19 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CZ 82/97

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text