Supreme Court dismissed cassation, allowing court-initiated evidence to prove work incapacity for pension rights. The court rejected the claim that such evidence is inadmissible. The court ruled that the judge's discretion to admit evidence cannot be restricted by interpretation.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an insured individual against a pension denial decision. The lower courts had admitted a medical expert's opinion ex officio to determine work incapacity, despite the insured's objection, which ultimately supported the denial of benefits. The court held that the judge's discretionary power under the Civil Procedure Code cannot be reduced by interpretation and that admitting such evidence is not an abuse of power.