Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PK 80/06 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal, ruling mixed employment and civil contracts for identical tasks constitute an attempt to evade labor law.

Case Number I PK 80/06
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal, remanding the case to the Court of Appeal in Łódź for a new decision. The plaintiff argued that a contract mixing employment and civil law terms for the same radio production duties was a sham to bypass labor protections. The Court held that performing identical tasks under both contract types simultaneously violates the principle of a single employment relationship and constitutes an attempt to evade statutory rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 115 § 1 k.k.; Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.; Art. 316 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.; Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.; Art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c.: An employer and employee cannot perform the same duties partially under an employment contract and partially under a civil law contract, as this structure constitutes an attempt to evade labor and social security laws.

Keywords

AI generated
attempt to evade labor law mixed employment and civil contract identical tasks dual contracts single employment relationship principle cassation appeal dismissal social security evasion labor law protection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 115 § 1 k.k.
Art. 233 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 328 § 2 k.p.c.
Art. 316 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 391 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 4 k.p.c.
Art. 3983 § 3 k.p.c.
Art. 39815 § 1 k.p.c.
art. 233 k.p.c
art. 316 k.p.c

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text