III PO 3/06
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where prosecutor's late retirement request is stayed pending case conclusion.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed Stanisław R.'s appeal against the General Prosecutor's refusal to grant consent for him to continue serving after turning 65. The prosecutor argued that the request was filed late, violating the six-month deadline, and that statutory grounds for continued service were absent. The court ruled that the statutory provision staying service until the conclusion of proceedings applies even when the request is filed late, making the procedural defect non-fatal.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 69 § 1, 3 u.s.p.; Art. 62a ust. 1 ustawy o prokuraturze: The statutory stay of retirement until the conclusion of proceedings applies even if the request is filed late, and the General Prosecutor cannot grant consent in such cases.
Keywords
AI generated
prosecutor retirement
retirement request deadline
service stay proceedings
Supreme Court appeal
procedural defect
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 69 § 1 i 3 ustawy z dnia 27 lipca 2001 r. - Prawo o ustroju sądów powszechnych
art. 62a ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 czerwca 1985 r. o prokuraturze
art. 39814 k.p.c.
art. 39814 k.p.c