Supreme Court dismissed cassation; missing procedural docs do not force minimum pension if higher income proven.

Supreme Court allows pension claimer's evidence of earnings despite missing official documents. The court ruled that other written evidence is admissible in pension proceedings. The decision clarifies that strict reliance on specific documents is not required. The court found a clear violation of pension calculation regulations. The case establishes that alternative proof of income is valid. The ruling emphasizes the need for a comprehensive review of all available evidence. The court overturned the lower court's dismissal of the pension claim. The decision ensures fair assessment of pension entitlements based on all facts. The judgment protects the rights of pensioners in difficult evidentiary situations.